|
|
Post by Çêã µÅwK ~T*G~ on Jan 19, 2004 20:12:24 GMT -5
I unoo...got a roblem what that? huh? HUH?
|
|
|
|
Post by krownz on Jan 19, 2004 20:55:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by krownz on Jan 19, 2004 20:56:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Çêã µÅwK ~T*G~ on Jan 21, 2004 21:29:16 GMT -5
good you SHOULD be!
|
|
|
|
Post by Çêã µÅwK ~T*G~ on Jan 21, 2004 21:30:25 GMT -5
hey eags...howd u get ur font etc to stay?
[glow=red,2,300]Like how would I get this to stay?[/glow]
|
|
|
|
Post by krownz on Jan 22, 2004 16:17:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bubbles on Jan 22, 2004 19:05:21 GMT -5
like, to be, or not to be
|
|
|
|
Post by krownz on Jan 22, 2004 20:00:17 GMT -5
that is the question[/color]
|
|
|
|
Post by ÑèøMâñ5 on Jan 24, 2004 23:03:48 GMT -5
and the answer is to be. took me a good few days to gind out out, have the formula on a chack board at my house.
|
|
|
|
Post by krownz on Jan 24, 2004 23:08:51 GMT -5
Yeah, it's always better to 'be' than to 'not to be'
'Cause if you're 'be' you can always change to 'not to be' cause you're positive, not negative. 'Cause if you're negative, you need another negative to make you positive again. But if you are positive, you can be whatever you want, cause you start with the letter "P"!
I hope this cleared A LOT of stuff up for you guys.[/color]
|
|
|
|
Post by -·øs·- 187killã on Jan 27, 2004 21:01:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by -·øs·- 187killã on Jan 27, 2004 21:01:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bubbles on Feb 2, 2004 2:33:35 GMT -5
lol
|
|
|
|
Post by krownz on Feb 2, 2004 16:43:15 GMT -5
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by bubbles on Feb 2, 2004 19:15:10 GMT -5
|
|
